Key result
Blood pressure control rates for common antihypertensive regimens, including RAS blocker monotherapy, were significantly lower in Australian compared to US older adults (45.5% vs 54.2%; P=0.002).
Why the study?
The association of different antihypertensive regimens with blood pressure control is not well-described among community-dwelling older adults with low comorbidity.
How do antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control rates compare between treated older adults in Australia and the US?
Cross-Sectional (n=10,062)
Yes
How do antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control rates compare between treated older adults in Australia and the US?
There is significant geographic variation in antihypertensive regimen use and blood pressure control rates among older adults, with US patients achieving better control than Australian patients across common regimens.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geographic BP control gaps in older adults warrant regimen review; cross-sectional data leaves open causal factors and practice implications.
The association of different antihypertensive regimens with blood pressure (BP) control is not well-described among community-dwelling older adults with low comorbidity. We examined antihypertensive use and BP control in 10 062 treated hypertensives from Australia and the United States (US) using baseline data from the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) trial. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) drugs were the most prevalently used antihypertensive in both countries (Australia: 81.7% of all regimens; US: 62.9% of all regimens; P < .001). Diuretics were the next most commonly used antihypertensive in both countries, but were more often included in regimens of US participants (48.9%, vs 33.3% of regimens in Australia; P < .001). Among all antihypertensive classes and possible combinations, monotherapy with a RAS drug was the most common regimen in both countries, but with higher prevalence in Australian than US participants (35.9% vs 20.9%; P < .001). For both monotherapy and combination users, BP control rates across age, ethnicity, and sex were consistently lower in Australian than US participants. After adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and BMI, significantly lower BP control rates remained in Australian compared to US participants for the most commonly used classes and regimens (RAS blocker monotherapy: BP control = 45.5% vs 54.2%; P = .002; diuretic monotherapy: BP control = 45.2% vs 64.5%; P = .001; and RAS blocker/diuretic combo: BP control = 50.2% vs 65.6%; P = .001). Our findings highlight variation in antihypertensive use in older adults treated for hypertension, with implications for BP control. Differences in BP control that were observed may be influenced, in part, by reasons other than choice of specific regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ernst et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=10,062). Australian residence and antihypertensive regimens vs. United States residence was evaluated on Blood pressure control (RAS blocker monotherapy) (p=.002). Blood pressure control rates for common antihypertensive regimens, including RAS blocker monotherapy, were significantly lower in Australian compared to US older adults (45.5% vs 54.2%; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: