Key result
The ThinLine bipolar pacing lead demonstrated appropriate mechanical and electrical characteristics over 2 years, with mean chronic pulse width thresholds of 0.14 ms in the atrium and 0.10 ms in the ventricle.
Observational (n=25)
Yes
The ThinLine bipolar pacing lead demonstrated satisfactory handling and appropriate electrical characteristics over a 2-year follow-up, offering a thinner and more flexible alternative to traditional bipolar leads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports thinner lead feasibility in select cases; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BREIVIK et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Pacemaker indication (n=25). ThinLine bipolar pacing lead was evaluated on Electrical parameters (pulse width thresholds, pacing impedances, electrogram amplitudes). The ThinLine bipolar pacing lead demonstrated appropriate mechanical and electrical characteristics over 2 years, with mean chronic pulse width thresholds of 0.14 ms in the atrium and 0.10 ms in the ventricle.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: