Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, the chemical profile of leatherwood honey was analysed from a large sample size ( n = 133) to establish descriptors that could provide value as markers of botanical origin. Volatile and semi-volatiles were analysed by GC–MS and GC-FID revealing the major compounds 3,7-dimethylocta-1,5,7-trien-3-ol (2.4 ± 0.8 mg/kg), 2,6-dimethylocta-3,7-diene-2,6-diol (24.2 ± 5.4 mg/kg), 2,6-dimethylocta-2,7-diene-1,6-diol (3.9 ± 1.0 mg/kg), 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde (2.4 ± 1.5 mg/kg), 1,4-dimethylindanyl acetate (5.0 ± 1.4 mg/kg), dehydrovomifoliol (18.2 ± 2.2 mg/kg) and 11 unknown compounds with concentrations above 2.7 mg/kg. Phenolic and non-polar compounds were analysed by HPLC-DAD/MS showing high quantities of 3-phenyllactic acid (15.8 ± 9.6 mg/kg), methyl syringate (7.5 ± 5.6 mg/kg), vanillic acid (4.8 ± 2.5 mg/kg) and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (2.1 ± 0.5 mg/kg). A key finding of this study is the identification of the fluorescent compound lumiflavin in leatherwood honey, which could be used as a non-specific marker to authenticate leatherwood honey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: