Why the study?
Does multiplane TEE improve the detection of lead abnormalities and thrombi compared to TTE in patients with permanent transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators?
Does multiplane TEE improve the detection of lead abnormalities and thrombi compared to TTE in patients with permanent transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators?
Multiplane TEE is superior to TTE for visualizing transvenous defibrillation leads and detecting asymptomatic abnormalities like displaced coils and thrombi, though the clinical significance of these findings remains unclear.
Multiplane TEE may detect more ICD lead abnormalities than TTE; leaves open whether findings warrant routine screening or intervention.
Permanent transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator leads were investigated by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (1) to determine whether intracardiac lead segments can be visualized, (2) to verify the position of the coils, and (3) to detect possible thrombus formation. The diagnostic information obtained in 62 patients by TEE was compared to that of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Abnormal findings were only visualized by multiplane TEE. However, further controlled studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of displaced caval (one patient) and ventricular coils (15 patients), ventricular (1 patient) or atrial (6 patients) loops, and of clinically uneventful thrombi (13 patients).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fehske et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: