Key result
Home care workers with some or a lot of prior heart failure training had 14% higher job satisfaction compared to those with none or a little training (aPR 1.14).
Why the study?
Prior qualitative studies showed home care workers lack training and confidence in heart failure care, but the prevalence of heart failure training and its link to job satisfaction remained unquantified.
Does heart failure training improve job satisfaction in home care workers caring for adults with heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=323)
Does heart failure training improve job satisfaction in home care workers caring for adults with heart failure?
Relative Risk: 1.14 (95% CI 1.03–1.27)
p-value: p=0.014
Providing heart failure-specific training to home care workers is associated with higher job satisfaction and may improve their caregiving experience.
HF training may boost home care worker satisfaction; leaves open causal effects on retention or outcomes in prospective trials.
Background: Home care workers (HCWs), who include home health aides and personal care attendants, frequently care for adults with heart failure (HF). Despite substantial involvement in HF care, prior qualitative studies have found that HCWs lack training and confidence, which creates challenges for this workforce and potentially for patient care. Herein, we quantified the prevalence of HF training among HCWs and determined its association with job satisfaction. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of agency-employed HCWs caring for HF patients across New York, NY from 2018-2019. HF training was assessed with, "Have you received prior HF training?" Job satisfaction was assessed with, "How satisfied are you with your job?" The association between HF training and job satisfaction was determined with robust poisson regression. Results: 323 HCWs from 23 agencies participated; their median age was 50 years (IQR: 37,58), 94% were women, 44% were non-Hispanic Black, 23% were Hispanic, 78% completed ≥ high school education, and 72% were foreign-born. They had been caregiving for a median of 8.5 years (IQR: 4,15) and 73% had cared for 1-5 HF patients. Two-thirds received none/a little HF training and 82% felt satisfied with their job. In a fully adjusted model, HCWs with some/a lot of HF training had 14% higher job satisfaction than those with none/a little HF training (aPR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.27). Conclusions: The majority of HCWs have not received HF training. HF training was associated with higher job satisfaction, suggesting that HF training programs may improve HCWs' experience caring for this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sterling et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Home care workers caring for adults with heart failure (n=323). Heart failure training (some or a lot) vs. None or a little heart failure training was evaluated on Job satisfaction (aPR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27, p=0.014). Home care workers with some or a lot of prior heart failure training had 14% higher job satisfaction compared to those with none or a little training (aPR 1.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: