Key result
Intravenous pimobendan acted as a stronger arterio-venodilator than oral captopril, producing marked pulmonary and venous dilation in addition to comparable systemic vasodilation in patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does pimobendan improve acute hemodynamics compared to captopril in patients with chronic heart failure?
Population
10 patients with chronic heart failure, mean age 62.5 years, 90% male. 5 patients had dilated cardiomyopathy…
Comparison
Pimobendan 2.5 mg intravenous bolus vs Captopril 12.5 mg orally
Follow-up
6 hours
Authors
Loading...
May support acute IV use in chronic HF; leaves open outcome trials before practice change.
Does pimobendan improve acute hemodynamics compared to captopril in patients with chronic heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 1884% vs 2200%
p-value: p=<0.01
In patients with chronic heart failure, intravenous pimobendan acts as a stronger arterio-venodilator than oral captopril, producing marked pulmonary arteriovasodilating and venodilating effects.
Tsuda et al. (1992) studied Chronic heart failure (n=10). Pimobendan vs. Captopril 12.5 mg orally was evaluated on Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at 2 hours (dyne·sec·cm-5) (p=<0.01). Intravenous pimobendan acted as a stronger arterio-venodilator than oral captopril, producing marked pulmonary and venous dilation in addition to comparable systemic vasodilation in patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: