Key result
Sublingual GTN administration in healthy young men significantly increased the ophthalmic artery resistive index from 0.77 at baseline to 0.85 (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does nitric oxide modulation alter ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity waveform morphology in healthy young men?
Does nitric oxide modulation alter ophthalmic artery blood flow velocity waveform morphology in healthy young men?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.85% vs 0.77%
p-value: p=<0.05
Quantification of changes in the flow velocity spectral waveform sensitively identifies NO modulation of smooth muscle tone prior to alteration in systemic hemodynamics.
Waveform RI sensitively detects GTN-induced ocular vasodilation before systemic effects; extends NO research but leaves open clinical relevance.
Quantitative analysis of the arterial pressure pulse waveform recorded by applanation tonometry of the radial artery can track NO (nitric oxide)-mediated modulation of arterial smooth muscle tone. The changes in pressure pulse waveform morphology result from pulse wave reflection arising predominantly from smaller arteries and arterioles. Employing Doppler ultrasound to record the spectral flow velocity waveform in the ophthalmic artery, we studied the effects of NO modulation on waveforms recorded in the proximity of the terminal ocular microcirculatory bed. In healthy young men (n=10; age 18-26 years), recordings were made at baseline, following 300 mug of sublingual GTN (glyceryl trinitrate) and during the intravenous infusion of 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg of L-NAME (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester). Peaks (P1, P2 and P3) and nodes (N1, N2 and N3) on the arterial flow velocity waveform were identified during the cardiac cycle and employed to quantify wave shape change in response to the haemodynamic actions of the pharmacological interventions. The administration of GTN resulted in a significant (P<0.05) increase in heart rate without significant alteration in blood pressure. At the doses employed, L-NAME did not significantly alter systemic haemodynamics. With the exception of peak Doppler systolic velocity, all other peaks and nodes decreased significantly in response to GTN (P<0.05 for all points compared with baseline). In response to the administration of L-NAME, all peaks and nodes decreased significantly (P<0.05 for all points compared with baseline). The resistive index, a ratio calculated from the peak and trough flow velocities employed to assess change in flow resistance, increased significantly in response to GTN (0.77 at baseline compared with 0.85; P<0.05). Quantification of changes in the flow velocity spectral waveform during the cardiac cycle sensitively identified NO modulation of smooth muscle tone prior to alteration in systemic haemodynamics. Focusing on the resistive index, which identifies isolated points on the waveform describing the excursions of flow, may provide misleading information in relation to the haemodynamic effects of drug interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lockhart et al. (2006) studied Healthy (n=10). GTN and L-NAME vs. Baseline was evaluated on Resistive index (p=<0.05). Sublingual GTN administration in healthy young men significantly increased the ophthalmic artery resistive index from 0.77 at baseline to 0.85 (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: