Key result
Patients with concurrent cancer and coronary artery disease requiring revascularisation face higher risks of morbidity and mortality compared to those without cancer.
Why the study?
Patients with cancer increasingly undergo coronary revascularisation but carry higher morbidity and mortality risks, with outcomes varying by cancer characteristics and key evidence gaps remaining.
Patients with concurrent cancer and CAD requiring revascularisation carry a higher risk of morbidity and mortality, necessitating tailored management based on cancer characteristics.
>10% of revascularized CAD patients have cancer history; leaves open optimal strategies for this high-risk group.
Cancer and coronary artery disease (CAD) overlap in traditional risk factors as well as molecular mechanisms underpinning the development of these two disease states. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of developing CAD, representing a high-risk population that are increasingly undergoing coronary revascularisation. Over 1 in 10 patients with CAD that require revascularisation with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting have either a history of cancer or active cancer. These patients are typically older, have more comorbidities and have more extensive CAD compared with patients without cancer. Haematological abnormalities with competing risks of thrombosis and bleeding pose further unique challenges during and after revascularisation. Management of patients with concurrent cancer and CAD requiring revascularisation is challenging as these patients carry a higher risk of morbidity and mortality compared with those without cancer, often driven by the underlying cancer and associated comorbidities. However, due to variability by different types and stages of cancer, revascularisation outcomes are specific to cancer characteristics such as the timing of onset, cancer subtype and site, stage, presence of metastases, and cancer-related therapies received. Recent studies have provided insights into defining revascularisation outcomes, procedural considerations and best practices in managing patients with cancer. Nevertheless, many gaps remain that require further studies to inform clinical best practices in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leedy et al. (2021) conducted a review in Concurrent cancer and coronary artery disease. Coronary revascularisation vs. Patients without cancer was evaluated. Patients with concurrent cancer and coronary artery disease requiring revascularisation face higher risks of morbidity and mortality compared to those without cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: