Why the study?
Does intravenous endothelin produce unique hemodynamic responses compared to sodium nitroprusside and methoxamine in conscious rats?
Does intravenous endothelin produce unique hemodynamic responses compared to sodium nitroprusside and methoxamine in conscious rats?
Intravenous endothelin induces a unique biphasic hemodynamic response pattern in conscious rats, suggesting direct cardiostimulatory and cardiodepressant actions.
May indicate direct cardiac actions of endothelin in rats; leaves open translation to human hemodynamics or therapy.
We investigated hemodynamic actions of endothelin (ET) in conscious rats. Intravenous injections of ET produced dose-dependent biphasic blood pressure (MAP) responses: initial decreases of up to 84 +/- 11 s were followed by increases of up to 1-h duration. Corresponding responses in cardiac output (CO), heart rate, and efferent splanchnic nerve activity were reciprocal to changes in MAP. Mesenteric blood flow showed an immediate and sustained decrease. Compared with equidepressor doses of sodium nitroprusside (NNP), ET produced a markedly different regional hemodynamic response pattern during the initial depressor phase. Compared with equipressor doses of the alpha-adrenoceptor agonist methoxamine, ET produced significantly greater vasoconstriction in hindlimb and renal vascular bed during pressor phase. ET-induced changes in CO were significantly greater than the respective CO responses to NNP and methoxamine in intact animals and following cardiac autonomic blockade with atenolol and methscopolamine. ET has vasodilator and vasoconstrictor properties that induce a unique hemodynamic response pattern on intravenous injection. Persistence of ET-induced changes in CO following cardiac autonomic blockade suggests direct cardiostimulatory actions of the peptide during depressor phase as well as direct cardiodepressant actions during pressor phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohmeiss et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: