Why the study?
Does the addition of Pellet Paint coprecipitant improve the sensitivity of the AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test in CSF specimens?
Does the addition of Pellet Paint coprecipitant improve the sensitivity of the AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test in CSF specimens?
The addition of a coprecipitant to the AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test improves sensitivity and minimizes false-negative results in CSF specimens.
May improve enterovirus PCR sensitivity in CSF; leaves open validation in larger prospective diagnostic studies before adoption.
The incorporation of a commercially available coprecipitant into the AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR test specimen preparation enhanced the sensitivity and reproducibility of this assay. Fifty-five previously tested archived cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) specimens were tested in a blind study in duplicate with and without Pellet Paint coprecipitant (Novagen, Inc., Madison, Wis.). Of these specimens, 26 had previously been determined to be positive and 29 had previously been determined to be negative. All previously positive CSF specimens were positive when Pellet Paint was used and only 18 were positive without Pellet Paint. No previously negative specimens were positive on repeat testing with or without Pellet Paint. The background signal was not affected by the addition of Pellet Paint. These data support the utility of a coprecipitant in minimizing false-negative results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taggart et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: