Key result
Depressed heart rate variability (≤6.5%) on standard 12-lead ECG was associated with a 2.68-fold higher likelihood of appropriate ICD therapy (95% CI 1.21-5.90; P=0.015).
Why the study?
Do standard 12-lead ECG measures predict appropriate therapy in ICD recipients?
Cohort (n=108)
Do standard 12-lead ECG measures predict appropriate therapy in ICD recipients?
Effect estimate: 2.68 (95% CI 1.21-5.90)
p-value: p=0.015
Simple parameters derived from a standard 10-second 12-lead ECG, such as heart rate variability, QRS dispersion, and T-wave amplitude, can help predict the likelihood of appropriate therapy in ICD recipients.
May refine arrhythmic risk stratification in ICD recipients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
AIMS: Identification of patients most likely to benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant remains a complex challenge. This study aimed to investigate the utility of measures derived from standard 10 s 12-lead electrocardiogrphy (ECG) without complex signal processing in predicting appropriate therapy in an ICD population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 108 ICD patients for primary (n = 32) and secondary prevention (n = 76). Baseline clinical data and characteristics of QRS complex, T-wave, and heart rate from standard 12-lead ECG were examined and related to the occurrence of subsequent appropriate therapy. Over a mean follow-up of 29 ± 11 months, 44% of patients received appropriate therapy. Patients with depressed heart rate variability (HRV) (≤6.5%) were 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-5.90, P = 0.015] times more likely to receive appropriate therapy than patients with HRV >6.5%. In patients with bundle branch block (BBB), large QRS dispersion of >39 ms was associated with 2.88 times risk (95% CI 1.24-6.71, P = 0.014) of experiencing appropriate therapy than those with QRS dispersion <39 ms. In patients without BBB, reduced maximum T-wave amplitude (<0.4 mV) were 3.82 times (95% CI 1.63-8.93, P = 0.002) more likely to receive appropriate therapy compared with those with maximum T-wave amplitude >0.4 mV. History of atrial arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.30, 95% CI 1.29-4.12, P = 0.005] and secondary prevention (HR = 2.55, 95% CI 1.14-5.71, P = 0.022) were also predictive of device therapy. CONCLUSION: Measurements from standard 12-lead ECG were predictive of appropriate therapy in a heterogeneous ICD population. Incorporation of 12-lead ECG parameters such as these into risk stratification models may improve our ability to select patients for ICD implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harding et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients (n=108). Depressed heart rate variability (≤6.5%) vs. Heart rate variability >6.5% was evaluated on appropriate therapy (2.68, 95% CI 1.21-5.90, p=0.015). Depressed heart rate variability (≤6.5%) on standard 12-lead ECG was associated with a 2.68-fold higher likelihood of appropriate ICD therapy (95% CI 1.21-5.90; P=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: