Why the study?
Does impedance cardiography reliably measure changes in cardiac stroke volume compared to the dye dilution technique in women undergoing cesarean section?
Does impedance cardiography reliably measure changes in cardiac stroke volume compared to the dye dilution technique in women undergoing cesarean section?
Impedance cardiography is a safe and reliable non-invasive alternative to dye dilution for tracking changes in stroke volume during cesarean section.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support tracking changes in cesarean patients; leaves open prospective validation before wider adoption.
Simultaneous determination of cardiac stroke volume by impedance cardiography and the dye dilution technique was compared in ten women undergoing elective cesarean section performed under general or epidural anesthesia. The influence of delivery and the anesthetic procedures used on stroke volume determination by the two methods was evaluated and compared. The correlation coefficients for measurements performed before and during anesthesia showed little variation and were largely unchanged after delivery of the child (r = 0.90-0.97). Mean stroke volume determined by impedance cardiography was significantly (P less than 0.001) lower than mean stroke volume calculated from the dye dilution technique. However, there was no significant difference between the mean change in stroke volume determined by the two techniques during serial measurements. Impedance cardiography was found to be a safe, reliable, non-invasive technique for the measurement of changes in stroke volume during cesarean section. The ability of the impedance method to determine changes in stroke volume was unaffected by the anesthetic procedures employed or by delivery of the child.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milsom et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: