Key result
Nonpulsatile and hyperpulsatile pressures significantly decreased fenestrae size (51% and 45%) and area fraction (45% and 54%) in porcine carotid arteries after 7 days compared to normal pressure.
Both nonpulsatile and hyperpulsatile pressures stimulate structural changes in the arterial wall matrix in an ex vivo model, providing a mechanistic link between pulse pressure and arterial stiffness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abnormal pulse pressures may promote arterial matrix remodeling; hypothesis-generating in ex vivo model and leaves open human translation.
The effect of pulse pressure on arterial wall remodeling has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study was to evaluate matrix remodeling in arteries under nonpulsatile and hyperpulsatile pressure as compared with arteries under normal pulsatile pressure. Porcine carotid arteries were cultured for 3 and 7 days under normal, nonpulsatile, and hyperpulsatile pressures with the same mean pressure and flow rate using an ex vivo organ culture model. Fenestrae in the internal elastic lamina, collagen, fibronectin, and gap junction protein connexin 43 were examined in these arteries using confocal microscopy, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry. Our results showed that after 7 days, the mean fenestrae size and the area fraction of fenestrae decreased significantly in nonpulsatile arteries (51% and 45%, respectively) and hyperpulsatile arteries (45% and 54%, respectively) when compared with normal pulsatile arteries. Fibronectin decreased (29.9%) in nonpulsatile arteries after 3 days but showed no change after 7 days, while collagen I levels increased significantly (106%) in hyperpulsatile arteries after 7 days. The expression of connexin 43 increased by 35.3% in hyperpulsatile arteries after 7 days but showed no difference in nonpulsatile arteries. In conclusion, our results demonstrated, for the first time, that an increase or a decrease in pulse pressure from its normal physiologic level stimulates structural changes in the arterial wall matrix. However, hyperpulsatile pressure has a more pronounced effect than the diminished pulse pressure. This effect helps to explain the correlation between increasing wall stiffness and increasing pulse pressure in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2009) studied Arterial wall remodeling. Nonpulsatile and hyperpulsatile pressure vs. Normal pulsatile pressure was evaluated on Matrix remodeling (fenestrae size, area fraction, fibronectin, collagen I, and connexin 43). Nonpulsatile and hyperpulsatile pressures significantly decreased fenestrae size (51% and 45%) and area fraction (45% and 54%) in porcine carotid arteries after 7 days compared to normal pressure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: