Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The adsorption structures and dissociation properties of PH 3 on Si(100)2*1 and Si(111)7*7 have been studied by the ASED MO method. Our calculation results show that, on the Si(100)2*1 surface, PH 3 is adsorbed undissociatively on the dangling bond, with a binding energy of 2.25 eV, Si-P bond length of 2.23 AA, an angle from the surface normal of 22 degrees , a P-H bond length of 1.52 AA and an angle of the PH 3 axis to the surface normal of 21 degrees . The dissociation energy barrier of the first H atom for PH 3 is about 1.61 eV, in agreement with the experimental results of molecular adsorption of PH 3 on Si(100) at room temperature. On S(111)7*7, the most stable site for PH 3 adsorption of S 2 DB and then the S 1 DB site; the binding energies are 2.11 eV and 1.00 eV, respectively. Using the DAS model in our calculation, our results show, that the energy barrier for PH 3 dissociation on S 1 DB and S 2 DB are 1.02 eV and 2.05 eV, respectively. If we replace the Si adatom in the DAS model by a Si 4 small cluster, the binding energies of PH 3 on S 2 DB and S 1 DB are 1.64 eV and negative, respectively. The dissociation energy barrier on S 2 DB will reduce to 0.48 eV. It seems that the dissociation of PH 3 on Si(111)7*7 is caused by some kind of defect on this surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: