Key result
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme versus didactic education in 236 patients with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Chronic heart failure carries high hospital admission rates that are largely avoidable through self-care, but no structured educative method has been developed to enhance self-care confidence.
Does a 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme improve self-care, quality of life, and reduce unplanned hospital service use compared to a didactic education programme in community-dwelling Chinese patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=236)
Block randomization
Yes
Does a 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme improve self-care, quality of life, and reduce unplanned hospital service use compared to a didactic education programme in community-dwelling Chinese patients with chronic heart failure?
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a 12-week empowerment-based self-care program for improving outcomes and reducing unplanned hospital use in patients with chronic heart failure.
Protocol for RCT of empowerment self-care in HF; leaves open whether it improves outcomes over education in Chinese patients.
AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effects of a 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme on the cognitive, psychological and behavioural aspects of self-care, health-related quality of life and unplanned hospital service use of chronic heart failure patients and to estimate its cost-effectiveness in reducing unplanned service use. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: The study will recruit 236 community-dwelling Chinese patients with chronic heart failure from regional hospitals in Hong Kong. Patients will be randomized in blocks to attend either the 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme or a didactic education programme. Central to the empowerment-based model is that the patients are the primary decision makers in self-care and act autonomously to manage the disease. Collaborative approach and interactive teaching strategies are used to optimize patients' engagement and knowledge translation to real-life practice. Outcome evaluation on self-care maintenance and management, symptom perception, self-care confidence, self-care knowledge, health-related quality of life and health service use will take place at baseline, on completion of the programme and at 12 weeks thereafter. Generalized estimating equations and Cox regression examine the intervention effects. Bootstrapping technique will be conducted to examine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The study is formally funded in December 2016. DISCUSSION: Chronic heart failure is associated with high level of hospital admissions, of which 40% is avoidable through effective self-care. Although self-care confidence is known to improve self-care, no structured educative method has been developed to enhance this attribute. This study addresses this research gap with a stringent application of theory and research design. IMPACT: The study illustrates the application of the empowerment model for self-care enhancement in patients with chronic heart failure. The findings will inform the ways and values of this care model to enhance the disease management of this expanding clinical cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (n=236). Empowerment-based self-care programme vs. Didactic education programme was evaluated on Cognitive, psychological and behavioural aspects of self-care, health-related quality of life and unplanned hospital service use. This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a 12-week empowerment-based self-care programme versus didactic education in 236 patients with chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: