Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 17, 2025Annals of Medicine and SurgeryOpen Access

Smart bioactive hydrogels for myocardial infarction repair: a multifunctional approach integrating stimuli-responsive drug delivery, electroconductivity, and real-time biosensing

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Smart bioactive hydrogels integrating drug delivery, electroconductivity, and biosensing reduced infarct size by 20-45% and enhanced LVEF by 8-15% in preclinical models of myocardial infarction.

Why the study?

Conventional treatments often fail to effectively restore cardiac function after myocardial infarction, necessitating innovative biomaterials such as multifunctional smart bioactive hydrogels.

Do smart bioactive hydrogels improve regenerative outcomes in preclinical models of myocardial infarction compared to conventional scaffolds?

Population

Preclinical cardiac models in studies published between 2010 and 2025

Comparison

Multifunctional smart bioactive hydrogels vs conventional hydrogels without multifunctionality

Design

Narrative review

Authors

ANAbubakar NazirRwanda Meteorological ServiceANAwais NazirGeneral CardiologyNKNaseer Muhammad KhanAfrican Explosives (South Africa)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Smart bioactive hydrogels may advance post-MI repair; leaves open clinical translation pending prospective trials.

Structured PICO

Do smart bioactive hydrogels improve regenerative outcomes in preclinical models of myocardial infarction compared to conventional scaffolds?

P
Population
Preclinical cardiac models of myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Smart bioactive hydrogels integrating stimuli-responsive drug delivery, electroconductivity, and real-time biosensing
C
Comparator
Conventional scaffolds/hydrogels without multifunctionality
O
Outcome
Regenerative outcomes including infarct size reduction, neovascular density, and left ventricular ejection fractionsurrogate

Multifunctional smart bioactive hydrogels demonstrate superior regenerative outcomes compared to conventional scaffolds in preclinical models of myocardial infarction.

Limitations

  • Variability in experimental design
  • Lack of standardized endpoints
  • Limited long-term clinical data
  • variability in experimental design
  • lack of standardized endpoints
  • limited long-term clinical data

Cite This Study

Nazir et al. (2025) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction. Smart bioactive hydrogels vs. Conventional scaffolds was evaluated. Smart bioactive hydrogels integrating drug delivery, electroconductivity, and biosensing reduced infarct size by 20-45% and enhanced LVEF by 8-15% in preclinical models of myocardial infarction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9a0e235b5cd9ea34aa86f0https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000004284
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Injectable Shear-Thinning Hydrogels for Minimally Invasive Delivery to Infarcted Myocardium to Limit Left Ventricular Remodeling2016 · 142 citations
  2. 2Hydrogel-load exosomes derived from dendritic cells improve cardiac function via Treg cells and the polarization of macrophages following myocardial infarction2021 · 111 citations
  3. 3Performance of a Hydrogel Composite Pericardial Substitute After Long-term Implant Studies1992 · 18 citations
  4. 4Cardiac stem cells: Current knowledge and future prospects2022 · 46 citations
  5. 5Gold nanoparticles: preparation, properties, and applications in bionanotechnology2011 · 1,355 citations