Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we critically examine Molly Gardner’s favored solution to what she calls “the problem of justified harm.” We argue that Gardner’s view is false and that her arguments in support of it are unconvincing. Finally, we briefly suggest an alternative solution to the problem which avoids the difficulties that beset Gardner’s proposal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johansson et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: