Key result
In models, ARBs inhibit AT1R without affecting SARS-CoV-2 entry, whereas MasR agonist AVE0991 enhances infection.
Why the study?
Evaluating potential interactions between the angiotensin system and ACE2/spike proteins and their relevance to COVID-19 severity.
ARBs may be safe and effective in managing COVID-19 by inhibiting deleterious AT1R activation without increasing viral entry, whereas MasR agonists might facilitate viral invasion by upregulating ACE2.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Model results warrant caution with MasR agonists; hypothesis-generating for ARB effects in SARS-CoV-2, pending clinical trials.
ACE2, serving as a receptor to SARS-CoV-2, is a key player in RAAS. Consequent ACE2 depletion disrupts the balance between the Ang II/ AT1R and Ang (1-7)/MasR arms of the angiotensin system, promoting intense inflammation. A crosstalk existing between the angiotensin system and ACE2/spike proteins may affect the infection severity, with potential therapeutic implications. Evaluating such potential interactions and their relevance to the severity of COVID-19, which is directly affected by ACE2 abundance or indirectly by RAAS axis dysregulation. The intensity of SARS-CoV-2 infection was assessed using a cell-to-cell fusion assay and AT1R activation was assessed using AT1R-Tango approach. We demonstrate the critical function of ACE2 in mitigating AT1R activation, which is disrupted following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, we show that the spike protein indirectly intensifies AT1R activation. Beyond its established role in activating MasR, Ang1-7 was found to function as a biased agonist for AT1R, without altering ACE2 levels or affecting SARS-CoV-2 entry. In contrast, AVE0991, a MasR agonist, was observed to increase ACE2 levels and enhance SARS-CoV-2 infection. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) effectively inhibited AT1R activity and had minimal impact on viral entry. Our data supports the likelihood that AT1R blockers (ARBs) may be effective in managing COVID-19 since they inhibit AT1R activation and its deleterious subsequent effects, with no impact on SARS-CoV-2 entry. By contrast, MasR and its agonist AVE0991, by increasing ACE2 levels, may restore RAAS physiological balance, but facilitate host cell invasion by SARS-CoV-2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied COVID-19. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and MasR agonists was evaluated on AT1R activation and SARS-CoV-2 infection intensity. In experimental models, angiotensin receptor blockers effectively inhibited AT1R activity with minimal impact on SARS-CoV-2 viral entry, whereas the MasR agonist AVE0991 enhanced viral infection.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: