Key result
The plasma HEPTEST demonstrated better correlation with anti-Xa levels than APTT at low heparin concentrations (r=0.933 vs 0.772), supporting its use for monitoring heparin in pregnancy.
Why the study?
Does the HEPTEST assay provide a reliable alternative to anti-Xa assays for monitoring heparin in pregnant women?
Does the HEPTEST assay provide a reliable alternative to anti-Xa assays for monitoring heparin in pregnant women?
The plasma HEPTEST is a reliable alternative to the chromogenic anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy, particularly at low heparin concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support replacing anti-Xa with HEPTEST for heparin monitoring in pregnancy; leaves open its role pending human validation.
Methods of monitoring heparin in pregnancy are problematic. The aim of this study was to assess the plasma HEPTEST as a rapid and reliable test for heparin monitoring in pregnancy. HEPTEST, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and chromogenic anti-Xa assays were performed on individual heparin-spiked plasma samples from two groups: normal non-pregnant women (n = 6) and normal pregnant women during the third trimester (n = 6). Heparin activity curves were established in plasma from both groups for low (< 0.3 IU/ml), intermediate (0.3-0.7 IU/ml) and high (> 0.7 IU/ml) heparin concentrations and validated by comparison with the anti-Xa chromogenic assay. Both the APTT and HEPTEST demonstrated good correlation with anti-Xa levels across all heparin concentrations in both plasma groups (r range = 0.879-0.945). In comparison with the APTT, the HEPTEST showed better correlation with anti-Xa levels at low concentrations of heparin (r values 0.933 vs. 0.772, respectively). For both the APTT and HEPTEST there were significant differences between the clotting times in pregnant and non-pregnant plasma at a number of heparin concentrations. This data supports the plasma HEPTEST as an acceptable alternative to the chromogenic anti-Xa assay for monitoring heparin thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (1999) studied Pregnancy (n=12). HEPTEST vs. APTT and chromogenic anti-Xa assays was evaluated on Correlation with anti-Xa levels (r = 0.933 vs 0.772). The plasma HEPTEST demonstrated better correlation with anti-Xa levels than APTT at low heparin concentrations (r=0.933 vs 0.772), supporting its use for monitoring heparin in pregnancy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: