Key result
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension (OR 2.46 vs 1.39) and tobacco use, were significantly stronger predictors of incident CVD in adults with versus without lifetime depression.
Why the study?
Does a history of clinical depression amplify the effect of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on incident cardiovascular disease in adults?
Cohort (n=26,840)
Yes
Does a history of clinical depression amplify the effect of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on incident cardiovascular disease in adults?
Lifetime depressive disorder amplifies the atherogenic effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, increasing the risk of incident cardiovascular disease.
May support closer monitoring of traditional risk factors in adults with depression; leaves open causal confirmation in trials.
Background: Several mechanisms underlying the depression-to-cardiovascular disease (CVD) relationship have been proposed; however, few studies have examined whether depression promotes CVD through potentiating traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Purpose: To test the combined influence of three cardiovascular risk factors and lifetime depressive disorder on incident CVD in a large, diverse, and nationally representative sample of U.S. adults. Methods: Respondents were 26,840 adults without baseline CVD who participated in Waves 1 (2001-2002) and 2 (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Lifetime depressive disorder, tobacco use, hypertension, and incident CVD were determined from structured interviews, and body mass index (BMI) was computed from self-reported height and weight. Results: Logistic regression models predicting incident CVD (1,046 cases) revealed evidence of moderation, as the interactions between lifetime depressive disorder and current tobacco use (p = .002), hypertension (p < .001), and BMI (p = .031) were significant. The Former Tobacco Use × Lifetime Depressive Disorder interaction was not significant (p = .85). In models stratified by lifetime depressive disorder, current tobacco use (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.36-2.32, p < .001 vs. OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.24-1.60, p < .001), hypertension (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.98-3.07, p < .001 vs. OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.28-1.51, p < .001), and BMI (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.20, p = .031 vs. OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.99-1.07, p = .16) were stronger predictors of incident CVD in adults with versus without a lifetime depressive disorder. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that amplifying the atherogenic effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors may be yet another candidate mechanism that helps to explain the excess CVD risk of people with depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polanka et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease and depression (n=26,840). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors (tobacco use, hypertension, BMI) with lifetime depressive disorder vs. Adults without lifetime depressive disorder was evaluated on Incident CVD (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.98-3.07, p=<0.001). Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension (OR 2.46 vs 1.39) and tobacco use, were significantly stronger predictors of incident CVD in adults with versus without lifetime depression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: