Key result
Starting both ACE-I/ARB and a beta-blocker in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with mid-range or preserved ejection fraction was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.46) compared to no neurohormonal antagonists.
Why the study?
The clinical benefits of neurohormonal antagonists for patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF are uncertain.
Does starting both ACE-I/ARB and a beta-blocker reduce the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute HF with HFmrEF or HFpEF?
Observational (n=858)
Yes
Does starting both ACE-I/ARB and a beta-blocker reduce the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization in patients hospitalized for acute HF with HFmrEF or HFpEF?
In patients hospitalized for acute HF with EF ≥40%, initiating both an ACE-I/ARB and a beta-blocker at discharge is associated with a significantly lower 1-year risk of death or HF hospitalization.
May support combined ACE-I/ARB and β-blocker initiation at discharge in acute HFmrEF/HFpEF; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of neurohormonal antagonists for patients with heart failure (HF) with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF and HFpEF) are uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study analyzed 858 consecutive patients with HFmrEF (EF: 40-49%) or HFpEF (EF ≥50%), who were hospitalized for acute HF, and who were discharged alive, and were not taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE)-I/ angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) or β-blockers at admission. The study population was classified into 4 groups according to the status of prescription of ACE-I/ARB and β-blocker at discharge: no neurohormonal antagonist (n=342, 39.9%), ACE-I/ARB only (n=128, 14.9%), β-blocker only (n=189, 22.0%), and both ACE-I/ARB and β-blocker (n=199, 23.2%) groups. The primary outcome measure was a composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was 41.2% in the no neurohormonal antagonist group, 34.0% in the ACE-I/ARB only group, 28.6% in the β-blocker only group, and 16.4% in the both ACE-I/ARB and β-blocker group (P<0.001). Compared with the no neurohormonal antagonist group, both the ACE-I/ARB and β-blocker groups were associated with a significantly lower risk for a composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28-0.76, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In hospitalized patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF, starting both ACE-I/ARB and a β-blocker was associated with a reduced risk of the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization compared with patients not starting on an ACE-I/ARB or β-blocker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seko et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute heart failure with mid-range and preserved ejection fraction (n=858). Both ACE-I/ARB and beta-blocker vs. No neurohormonal antagonist was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.76, p=0.002). Starting both ACE-I/ARB and a beta-blocker in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with mid-range or preserved ejection fraction was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.46) compared to no neurohormonal antagonists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: