Key result
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement both improved self-rated function and reduced symptoms at 6 months, with syncope dropping from 25% to 0%.
Why the study?
Does TAVI compared to SAVR improve self-reported function, symptoms, and HRQoL in patients with aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=48)
Does TAVI compared to SAVR improve self-reported function, symptoms, and HRQoL in patients with aortic stenosis?
Both TAVI and SAVR provide comparable improvements in self-reported function, symptoms, and health-related quality of life at 6 months in patients with aortic stenosis.
Comparable HRQoL gains after TAVI or SAVR should not yet change practice; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis is the most common valve disease in western countries and has poor prognosis without treatment. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the gold standard, and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a new method that is used in high-risk patients who are denied surgery. The purpose of treatment is not only to save life, but also to reduce symptoms and increase health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe patients' self-reported outcomes in terms of physical function, symptoms, dependence, HRQoL, and cognitive function after TAVI and SAVR. METHODS: All patients treated with TAVI during 1 year ( n = 24) and age-matched patients treated with SAVR ( n = 24) were included. Data were collected on the day before and at 6 months after treatment using structural questionnaires. RESULTS: Self-rated function was low before treatment and increased at follow-up. A quarter of all patients reported syncope at baseline, and none reported this at follow-up. Breathlessness was reported by all patients to be the most limiting cardiac symptom, but the TAVI patients reported more severe symptoms. At 6 months' follow-up, symptoms were reduced, but breathlessness and fatigue were still common, especially in the TAVI group. HRQoL, which was very low in the TAVI group at baseline, increased in all dimensions except social function. CONCLUSION: We found no change in cognitive function or dependence at follow-up. There was no difference in the size of improvement between groups. The results could be helpful when informing future patients in order to give them realistic expectations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsson et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis (n=48). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Self-reported physical function, symptoms, dependence, HRQoL, and cognitive function. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement both improved self-rated function and reduced symptoms at 6 months, with syncope dropping from 25% to 0%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: