Key result
Deactivation of ICDs in end-of-life care presents psychological challenges for patients and professionals, prompting the development of the All-Wales ICD deactivation pathway.
Highlights the importance of timely discussions and structured pathways for elective ICD deactivation in end-of-life care to prevent unnecessary distress for patients and families.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Structured pathways may reduce distress in end-of-life ICD care; leaves open prospective validation of outcomes.
An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a small cardiac implant that monitors, detects and treats life-threatening arrhythmias. If a patient has advanced or terminal disease requiring end-of-life care, it is questionable whether life-sustaining treatments such as defibrillation are appropriate. In such situations it is important that patients and their relatives are given the opportunity to discuss elective deactivation of their ICDs. While deactivation is a simple procedure, from a psychological perspective it is sometimes thwarted with challenges for the patient, relatives and health-care professionals. Furthermore, deactivation of an ICD is often left until the last days of life, which can cause unnecessary distress for all concerned. The evidence, the views of patients, relatives and health-care professionals will be explored, along with a description of the development of the All-Wales ICD deactivation pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Churchouse et al. (2012) conducted a review in Advanced or terminal disease requiring end-of-life care with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Deactivation of ICDs was evaluated. Deactivation of ICDs in end-of-life care presents psychological challenges for patients and professionals, prompting the development of the All-Wales ICD deactivation pathway.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: