Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of salvage endovascular septectomy in patients with chronic abdominal aortic dissection after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Does salvage endovascular septectomy improve outcomes in patients with chronic abdominal aortic dissection after failed endovascular aneurysm repair?
Cohort (n=6)
Does salvage endovascular septectomy improve outcomes in patients with chronic abdominal aortic dissection after failed endovascular aneurysm repair?
Salvage endovascular septectomy appears to be a safe and effective technique for treating chronic abdominal aortic dissection after failed endovascular aneurysm repair.
Hypothesis-generating for salvage endovascular septectomy after failed EVAR; larger prospective studies needed before adoption.
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of salvage endovascular septectomy in patients with abdominal chronic aortic dissection (CAD) after endovascular aneurysm repair. A study cohort comprising 6 patients with chronic abdominal aortic dissection after failed endovascular aortic repair [mean age 62.5 (36-69) years] were enrolled to undergo salvage endovascular septectomy. The procedure involved entering the false lumen via the intrinsic visceral entry to perform a confined septectomy using a 'Gigli wire' to merge the true and false lumens. The outcomes were assessed by Digital angiography and computed tomography angiography. All 6 patients were successfully operated on; the diameters of the visceral abdominal aorta and the infrarenal abdominal aorta were similar at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months compared with the baseline; the patency of the visceral branch arteries was also stable at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months compared with the baseline; no occlusion of the visceral branch arteries was noted; no major vascular adverse events or deaths were observed. In this preliminary study, it was proven that salvage endovascular septectomy is a potentially advantageous technique that is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with CAD after failed endovascular aortic repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhuang et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chronic abdominal aortic dissection after failed endovascular aneurysm repair (n=6). Salvage endovascular septectomy was evaluated on Efficacy and safety (aortic diameters, visceral branch patency, major vascular adverse events, and deaths).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: