Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analytical validation study demonstrates accurate quantification of carnosine and anserine across diverse meats, indicating robust utility for food authentication and nutritional profiling.
Carnosine and anserine are bioactive, histidine-containing dipeptides recognized for their antioxidant, pH-buffering, and neuroprotective functions. However, their precise quantification is frequently compromised by their high structural similarity and complex matrix-induced analytical interferences. This study developed and validated an optimized, simplified extraction protocol coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) for the simultaneous determination of both dipeptides across diverse meat matrices, including Thai native black-bone chicken (Nin-Kaset), commercial broiler, pork, beef, and buffalo meat. Extraction efficiency was systematically optimized by modulating the solution pH. Under optimized conditions, the validated method demonstrated excellent linearity (1–200 µg mL−1, r2 ≥ 0.9990) with limits of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ) values at 0.0093/0.0283 mg g−1 for carnosine and 0.0139/0.0420 mg g−1 for anserine. Method accuracy was confirmed by satisfactory recoveries ranging from 96.64% to 102.68%, with repeatability values (RSDs) of 0.70–14.18%. Application to real matrices revealed distinct dipeptide profiles. Pork contained the highest carnosine level (3.59 ± 0.19 mg g−1), whereas white-feather Nin-Kaset exhibited the highest anserine level (6.77 ± 0.40 mg g−1). Overall, the validated framework offers a rapid, cost-effective, and robust approach for routine dipeptide profiling, supporting future applications in food authentication, nutritional evaluation and functional food development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaewkhow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: