Key result
Continuous flow LVAD implantation decreased moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation from 76.0% to 8.0% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from 71.6 to 58.3 mm.
Why the study?
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation improve left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and mitral regurgitation severity in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cohort (n=100)
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation improve left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and mitral regurgitation severity in patients with chronic heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuous flow LVADs significantly decompress the left ventricle, leading to early and sustained reductions in LVEDD and mitral regurgitation severity.
Pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) maximally unload the left ventricle (LV), leading to reverse remodeling of the myopathic LV that manifests as decreased LV end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and decreased severity of mitral regurgitation (MR). There is a paucity of data, however, regarding the ability of continuous flow (CF) pumps to adequately decompress the LV to induce similar reverse remodeling. We sought to evaluate the effects of CF-LVADs on LV reverse remodeling. From March 2006 through July 2011, one hundred patients with chronic heart failure underwent implantation of CF-LVAD (93 HeartMate II LVADs and seven HeartWare LVADs) as bridge-to-transplant (n = 68) and destination therapies (n = 32). Echocardiograms and right heart catheterizations were reviewed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months post-LVAD implantation. Mean age was 52.1 ± 12.1 years; etiology of heart failure was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 34 patients and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in 66 patients. Median LVAD support time was 378.3 days; 371.5 days for patients who received bridge-to-transplant therapy and 422.2 days for patients who underwent destination therapy. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension significantly decreased at 1 month post-LVAD implantation from 71.6 ± 12.4 to 58.3 ± 13.8 mm (p < 0.001). Severity of MR also significantly decreased from 76.0% of patients having moderate or severe MR preoperatively to 8.0% with moderate or severe MR at 1 month post-LVAD (p < 0.001). These reductions were maintained at 6 months. These data demonstrate the ability of a CF-LVAD to significantly decompress the LV, leading to significant reductions in LVEDD and severity of MR. This reverse remodeling was apparent in the early postoperative period and was sustained at 6 months. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether this correlates with clinical LV recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morgan et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in chronic heart failure (n=100). Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at 1 month (p=<0.001). Continuous flow LVAD implantation decreased moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation from 76.0% to 8.0% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from 71.6 to 58.3 mm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: