Key result
In a rat model of right ventricular heart failure, speckle tracking echocardiography showed limited diagnostic utility, while conventional variables like TAPSE had superior utility.
Why the study?
Does speckle tracking echocardiography improve the evaluation of right ventricular function compared to conventional echocardiography in a rat model of right ventricular heart failure?
Does speckle tracking echocardiography improve the evaluation of right ventricular function compared to conventional echocardiography in a rat model of right ventricular heart failure?
In a rat model of right ventricular heart failure, conventional echocardiographic parameters like TAPSE and tissue Doppler imaging offer superior diagnostic utility and reproducibility compared to speckle tracking echocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conventional parameters outperform speckle tracking for RV assessment in rats; leaves open translation to clinical evaluation.
Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has been reported to be a promising technique for evaluating right ventricular (RV) function in the clinical setting. On the other hand, the usefulness of STE for RV evaluation in small animal models has not been clarified, although the rat model is among the most commonly used animal models to develop novel effective treatments against pulmonary hypertension and RV heart failure (HF).We validated the use of STE and conventional echocardiographic variables for evaluating RV functions in a rat model by comparing the echocardiographic values of RVHF rats (n = 12) induced by monocrotaline injection with those of control rats (n = 12).Most conventional echocardiographic variables demonstrated that RVHF rats have significant RV dysfunction. The area under the curve (AUC) values to distinguish RV dysfunction in RVHF rats from normal RV function in control rats using fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV myocardial performance index (MPI), peak tissue Doppler tricuspid annular velocities at systole (Sa), and at early diastole (Ea) were 0.71, 0.98, 0.79, 0.92, and 0.91, respectively. However, using STE analysis for RV evaluation, limited reproducibility was observed (variability 19-37 %, ICC 0.74-0.88) and the only circumferential strain showed significantly lower absolute values (P = 0.039, AUC = 0.76).To evaluate RV function in rat models, circumferential strain may be useful, however, the reproducibility and diagnostic utility were limited. Conventional echocardiographic variables such as TAPSE, tissue Doppler Sa, and Ea have superior diagnostic utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kimura et al. (2015) studied Right Ventricular Heart Failure (n=24). Monocrotaline injection vs. Vehicle injection was evaluated on Right ventricular circumferential strain (%) (AUC 0.76, p=0.039). In a rat model of right ventricular heart failure, speckle tracking echocardiography showed limited diagnostic utility, while conventional variables like TAPSE had superior utility.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: