Key result
Low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation improved flow-mediated dilation by 2.56% (95% CI 0.69-3.80; P=0.07) compared with sham in patients with advanced chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Does low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation improve endothelial function and maximal oxygen uptake in patients with advanced chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=35)
Double-blind
randomized
Does low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation improve endothelial function and maximal oxygen uptake in patients with advanced chronic heart failure?
Mean Difference: 2.56 (95% CI 0.69–3.8)
p-value: p=0.07
Low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation may marginally improve endothelial function in advanced heart failure patients, though it did not significantly improve maximal oxygen uptake in this preliminary study.
Aim Obtain initial estimates of the change in brachial artery endothelial function and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2peak) with 8 weeks of low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation (LF-EMS) or sham in patients with advanced chronic heart failure. Methods and results Using a double blind, randomized design, 35 patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III–IV) were assigned to 8 weeks (5 × 60 min per week) of either LF-EMS (4 Hz, continuous) or sham (skin level stimulation only) of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles. Four of the five sessions were at home and one under supervision. Ultrasound images of resting brachial artery diameter and post 5 min occlusion to determine flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a marker of vascular function and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise test, were measured before and after LF-EMS (n = 20) and sham (n = 15) interventions. FMD improved by 2.56% (95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 3.80) with LF-EMS compared with sham (P = 0.07). There were no notable changes in VO2peak. Conclusions Improvements in FMD with LF-EMS may have a clinically meaningful effect as higher FMD is associated with better prognosis. This is a preliminary finding, and a larger trial is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ennis et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in advanced chronic heart failure (n=35). low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation (LF-EMS) vs. sham (skin level stimulation only) was evaluated on change in brachial artery endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation) (MD 2.56%, 95% CI 0.69-3.80, p=0.07). Low-frequency electrical muscle stimulation improved flow-mediated dilation by 2.56% (95% CI 0.69-3.80; P=0.07) compared with sham in patients with advanced chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: