Key result
A direct method using an SDS buffer with EDTA and magnetic beads resulted in the highest recovery rate (geometric mean of 11%) of poliovirus 1 from environmental silty sediments.
A newly developed direct method for extracting viral RNA from silty sediments enabled the first quantitative detection of human pathogenic viruses in river and estuarine sediments using RT-qPCR.
Facilitates quantitative virus detection in river sediments; leaves open standardization across matrices before routine surveillance.
Nine approaches to recover viral RNA from environmental silty sediments were newly developed and compared to quantify RNA viruses in sediments using molecular methods. Four of the nine approaches employed direct procedures for extracting RNA from sediments (direct methods), and the remaining five approaches used indirect methods wherein viral particles were recovered before RNA extraction. A direct method using an SDS buffer with EDTA to lyse viral capsids in sediments, phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol to extract RNA, isopropanol to concentrate RNA, and magnetic beads to purify RNA resulted in the highest rate of recovery (geometric mean of 11%, with a geometric standard deviation of 0.02; n = 7) of poliovirus 1 (PV1) inoculated in an environmental sediment sample. The direct method exhibiting the highest rate of PV1 recovery was applied to environmental sediment samples. One hundred eight sediment samples were collected from the Takagi River, Miyagi, Japan, and its estuary from November 2007 to April 2009, and the genomic RNAs of enterovirus and human norovirus in these samples were quantified by reverse transcription (RT)-quantitative PCR (qPCR). The human norovirus genome was detected in one sample collected at the bay, although its concentration was below the quantification limit. Meanwhile, the enterovirus genome was detected in two samples at the river mouth and river at concentrations of 8.6 × 10(2) and 2.4 × 10(2) copies/g (wet weight), respectively. This is the first report to obtain quantitative data for a human pathogenic virus in a river and in estuarine sediments using RT-qPCR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miura et al. (2011) studied Environmental viral contamination (n=108). Direct method using SDS buffer with EDTA, phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, isopropanol, and magnetic beads vs. Indirect methods and other direct methods was evaluated on Recovery rate of poliovirus 1 (PV1) inoculated in environmental sediment. A direct method using an SDS buffer with EDTA and magnetic beads resulted in the highest recovery rate (geometric mean of 11%) of poliovirus 1 from environmental silty sediments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: