Key result
Metoprolol treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction resulted in a similar incidence of congestive heart failure compared to placebo (27% vs 30%).
Why the study?
Does metoprolol reduce the incidence and severity of congestive heart failure in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=1,395)
Double-blind
Does metoprolol reduce the incidence and severity of congestive heart failure in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 27% vs 30%
Early administration of metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction does not increase the incidence of congestive heart failure and may reduce its severity, especially when initiated within 12 hours of symptom onset.
Metoprolol does not increase CHF incidence in suspected AMI; confirms safety and supports early use while extending prior RCT tolerability data.
In a double blind study of metoprolol in the treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction 698 patients (study group) received metoprolol and 697 a placebo (control group). Metoprolol was given in an intravenous dose of 15 mg as soon as possible after admission to hospital followed by 50 g by mouth four times a day for two days and thereafter 100 mg twice a day for three months. A placebo was similarly given. Congestive heart failure occurred in a similar percentage of patients in both the study (27%) and the control groups (30%). Its severity was estimated by calculating the total dose of frusemide given during the first four days in hospital. Less frusemide was given to patients treated with metoprolol compared with those given a placebo in the total series. An appreciably lower total dose of frusemide was given to patients included in the trial less than or equal to 12 hours after the onset of pain and treated with metoprolol compared with a placebo, while no difference was seen among patients treated later. The initial heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and infarct site affected the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herlitz et al. (1984) conducted an RCT in Suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=1,395). Metoprolol vs. Placebo was evaluated on Congestive heart failure. Metoprolol treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction resulted in a similar incidence of congestive heart failure compared to placebo (27% vs 30%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: