Key result
In human failing hearts, β2-stimulation was more arrhythmogenic than β1-stimulation, creating arrhythmogenic substrates via conduction velocity regulation and heterogeneous repolarization.
Why the study?
How do β1- and β2-adrenergic stimulation affect electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis in human failing versus donor hearts?
How do β1- and β2-adrenergic stimulation affect electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis in human failing versus donor hearts?
In human failing hearts, β2-adrenergic stimulation is more arrhythmogenic than β1-stimulation, providing mechanistic insight into arrhythmia substrates in heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Arrhythmia is the major cause of death in patients with heart failure, for which β-adrenergic receptor blockers are a mainstay therapy. But the role of β-adrenergic signaling in electrophysiology and arrhythmias has never been studied in human ventricles. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used optical imaging of action potentials and [Ca(2+)]i transients to compare the β1- and β2-adrenergic responses in left ventricular wedge preparations of human donor and failing hearts. β1-Stimulation significantly increased conduction velocity, shortened action potential duration, and [Ca(2+)]i transients duration (CaD) in donor but not in failing hearts, because of desensitization of β1-adrenergic receptor in heart failure. In contrast, β2-stimulation increased conduction velocity in both donor and failing hearts but shortened action potential duration only in failing hearts. β2-Stimulation also affected transmural heterogeneity in action potential duration but not in [Ca(2+)]i transients duration. Both β1- and β2-stimulation augmented the vulnerability and frequency of ectopic activity and enhanced substrates for ventricular tachycardia in failing, but not in donor, hearts. Both β1- and β2-stimulation enhanced Purkinje fiber automaticity, whereas only β2-stimulation promoted Ca-mediated premature ventricular contractions in heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: During end-stage heart failure, β2-stimulation creates arrhythmogenic substrates via conduction velocity regulation and transmurally heterogeneous repolarization. β2-Stimulation is, therefore, more arrhythmogenic than β1-stimulation. In particular, β2-stimulation increases the transmural difference between [Ca(2+)]i transients duration and action potential duration, which facilitates the formation of delayed afterdepolarizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lang et al. (2015) studied Heart failure. β2-stimulation vs. β1-stimulation was evaluated on Electrophysiological responses and arrhythmogenesis. In human failing hearts, β2-stimulation was more arrhythmogenic than β1-stimulation, creating arrhythmogenic substrates via conduction velocity regulation and heterogeneous repolarization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: