Key result
The Freedom SOLO stentless valve showed a marked decrease in durability, with freedom from structural valve deterioration falling to 62% and freedom from explantation to 72% at 9 years.
Why the study?
What is the mid-term durability and rate of structural valve deterioration of the Freedom SOLO stentless valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=149)
No
What is the mid-term durability and rate of structural valve deterioration of the Freedom SOLO stentless valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
The Freedom SOLO stentless valve shows a marked decrease in freedom from structural valve deterioration and explantation after 6-7 years, necessitating close long-term follow-up.
May warrant extended surveillance beyond 6 years in Freedom SOLO recipients; leaves open class effects among stentless valves.
OBJECTIVES: This study reports a series of pitfalls, premature failures and explantation of the third-generation Freedom SOLO (FS) bovine pericardial stentless valve. METHODS: A total of 149 patients underwent aortic valve replacement using the FS. Follow-up was 100% complete with an average observation time of 5.5 ± 2.3 years (maximum 8.7 years) and a total of 825 patient-years. Following intraoperative documentation, all explanted valve prostheses underwent histological examination. RESULTS: Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 years was 92, 88, 80, 70 and 62%, respectively. Fourteen prostheses required explantation due to valve-independent dysfunction (n = 5; i.e. thrombus formation, oversizing, aortic dilatation, endocarditis and suture dehiscence) or valve-dependent failure (acute leaflet tears, n = 4 and severe stenosis, n = 5). Thus, freedom from explantation at 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 years was 95, 94, 91, 81 and 72%, respectively. An acute vertical tear along the non-coronary/right coronary commissure to the base occurred at a mean of 6.0 years (range 4.3-7.3 years) and affected size 25 and 27 prostheses exclusively. Four FS required explantation after a mean of 7.5 years (range 7.0-8.3 years) due to severe functional stenosis and gross calcification that included the entire aortic root. CONCLUSIONS: The FS stentless valve is safe to implant and shows satisfying mid-term results in our single institution experience. Freedom from SVD and explantation decreased markedly after only 6-7 years, so that patients with FS require close observation and follow-up. Exact sizing, symmetric positioning and observing patient limitations are crucial for optimal outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanger et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve replacement (n=149). Freedom SOLO (FS) bovine pericardial stentless valve was evaluated on Freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) at 9 years. The Freedom SOLO stentless valve showed a marked decrease in durability, with freedom from structural valve deterioration falling to 62% and freedom from explantation to 72% at 9 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: