Key result
Cryoablation for AVNRT in patients with nonsustained tachycardia at electrophysiology study resulted in a similar recurrence rate compared to those with sustained tachycardia (6.3% vs 6.0%, P=0.6).
Why the study?
Does cryoablation prevent recurrence in patients with clinical AVNRT but only nonsustained AVNRT at EPS compared to those with sustained AVNRT at EPS?
Cohort (n=83)
No
Does cryoablation prevent recurrence in patients with clinical AVNRT but only nonsustained AVNRT at EPS compared to those with sustained AVNRT at EPS?
Cryoablation can achieve intermediate-term success in patients with clinical AVNRT even when only nonsustained tachycardia is inducible during electrophysiology study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports cryoablation for clinical AVNRT with nonsustained inducibility at EPS; leaves open randomized confirmation of long-term equivalence.
BACKGROUND: Inducibility of sustained tachycardia is preferred prior to cryoablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHOD: The Pediatric Electrophysiology Database of a single institution was retrospectively reviewed for patients with clinical sustained (≥ 30 seconds of symptoms) AVNRT documented by noninvasive means who underwent cryoablation for AVNRT to determine if intermediate-term success with cryoablation for AVNRT can be achieved without inducibility of sustained AVNRT during electrophysiology study (EPS). RESULTS: There were no differences between patients with sustained (≥ 30 seconds of tachycardia) AVNRT (N = 67) and patients with nonsustained (ns, ≥ 3 beats and <30 seconds of tachycardia) AVNRT at EPS (N = 16). Acute success was achieved without PR prolongation in all patients. Although duration of follow-up was shorter for the sustained group than the nonsustained group (2.7 ± 1.6 years vs 3.8 ± 1.4 years, P = 0.008), recurrence rate was similar (6% vs 6.3%, P = 0.6). In patients with only nonsustained AVNRT at EPS, supportive findings for procedural effectiveness seen: (1) Dual atrioventricular node physiology (DAVNP) was eliminated in 14/14, (2) the fast pathway effective refractory period (FPERP) decreased after ablation in 10/11, (3) sustained slow pathway conduction was eliminated in 8/8 including both patients without discrete DAVNP prior to ablation, and (4) FPERP increased during lesion formation in 10/10. CONCLUSION: Intermediate-term success can be achieved with cryoablation of ns AVNRT. Attention should be paid to supportive indicators of damage to slow pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suntharos et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (n=83). Nonsustained AVNRT during electrophysiology study vs. Sustained AVNRT during electrophysiology study was evaluated on Recurrence rate (p=0.6). Cryoablation for AVNRT in patients with nonsustained tachycardia at electrophysiology study resulted in a similar recurrence rate compared to those with sustained tachycardia (6.3% vs 6.0%, P=0.6).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: