Key result
Resting rabbit papillary muscles during hypoxia recovered to 94% of aerobic control force after reoxygenation, compared to 78% in muscles stimulated during hypoxia.
Absolute Event Rate: 94% vs 78%
In hypoxic myocardium, little ATP is available for basal metabolism regardless of contractile energy demand, suggesting that lower force recovery after reoxygenation in stimulated muscles is not related to the degree of inhibition of basal processes.
Suggests contractile rest during hypoxia aids recovery; leaves open translation beyond isolated rabbit muscle to clinical ischemia.
In rabbit papillary muscle contracting at 20 degrees C in nitrogen at 0.2 Hz, glycolytic ATP formation is just enough to support the diminished contractile activity. Basal metabolism, important to maintain cellular function and integrity, is strongly inhibited. In the present study, we address the question of whether the inhibition of basal processes in hypoxia determines redevelopment of force in reoxygenation. By not stimulating the muscle during hypoxia, we try to make more ATP available for basal processes. Isometric force of papillary muscles (0.2-Hz stimulation) is measured before, during, and after 40 minutes of hypoxia. ATP formation and utilization in hypoxia are estimated from lactate production and changes in nucleotides and creatine compounds. After reoxygenation, muscles stimulated during hypoxia produce a steady-state force of 78% of the aerobic control; resting muscles recover to 94%. In contrast to expectation, lactate production in hypoxic resting muscles is only 30% of that in contracting ones. The findings indicate that basal metabolic rate of hypoxic muscles at rest is 14% of that of quiescent, well-oxygenated myocardium. We conclude that in hypoxic myocardium little ATP is available for basal metabolism, irrespective of the energy demand of the contractile system. It is therefore unlikely that the lower force found after reoxygenation in muscles stimulated during hypoxia is related to the degree of inhibition of basal processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dietrich et al. (1990) studied Hypoxia in rabbit heart muscle. Resting (not stimulating) the muscle during hypoxia vs. Stimulating the muscle during hypoxia (0.2-Hz) was evaluated on Steady-state force recovery after reoxygenation (as % of aerobic control). Resting rabbit papillary muscles during hypoxia recovered to 94% of aerobic control force after reoxygenation, compared to 78% in muscles stimulated during hypoxia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: