Why the study?
Does small mechanical loading alter the variability of the human breathing pattern?
Does small mechanical loading alter the variability of the human breathing pattern?
Small mechanical loads alter breathing pattern variability, causing breath-by-breath values to cluster closer to the minimum of the work-alveolar ventilation-pattern parameter surface.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small mechanical loads may alter breathing variability; leaves open physiological role and clinical relevance pending larger studies.
The effect of low-level mechanical loading on the variability of the human breathing pattern was examined using a small elastic (E) load (approximately 10 cmH2O/1) and a small flow-resistive (R) load (approximately 3 cmH2O.1(-1).s) to approximately halve and double the normal respiratory mechanical time constant. The pooled responses from six subjects showed 1) E loading increased the mean estimated work rate (W); 2) R loading increased the mean tidal volume (VT), inspiratory duration (TI), and estimated W, and decreased mean breathing frequency (f) and mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI), while reducing the variabilities of f and VT/TI; 3) E loading significantly reduced the frequency of occurrence of large breaths from the control state, whereas the effect of R loading on this phenomenon was smaller and not significant; and 4) R loading tended to increase an E loading to decrease the significant VT:TI rank correlation seen in the nonloaded state. The influence of loading on the distributions of VT and f became apparent in the tendency of breath-by-breath values to cluster closer to the minimum of the W-VA-pattern parameter surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Andrew Daubenspeck (1981) studied this question. Small elastic and flow-resistive mechanical loading vs. Nonloaded control state was evaluated on Variability of the human breathing pattern.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: