Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered via an optimal quadripolar lead vector significantly reduced total ventricular activation time by a mean of 16 ms compared to baseline.
Why the study?
Does optimizing the pacing vector of a quadripolar LV lead improve ventricular activation times in patients with heart failure receiving CRT?
Observational (n=19)
No
Does optimizing the pacing vector of a quadripolar LV lead improve ventricular activation times in patients with heart failure receiving CRT?
Individualized programming of quadripolar LV lead vectors significantly improves ventricular activation times compared to standard configurations in both ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimal quadripolar vector selection was associated with up to 37% shorter activation times; hypothesis-generating for individualized CRT programming.
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is now generally delivered via quadripolar leads. Assessment of the effect of different vector programs from quadripolar leads on ventricular activation can be now done using non-invasive electrocardiographic mapping (ECM). Material and methods In nineteen patients with quadripolar LV leads, activation maps were constructed. The total ventricular activation time (TVaT) and the time for the bulk of ventricular activation (VaT 10–90 ) were calculated. Results CRT delivered via a quadripolar lead significantly reduced TVaT and VaT 10–90 by a mean of 16 ms and 31 ms, respectively, compared to baseline. There was a marked reduction in ventricular activation between the most and least synchronous vectors: 28% difference in baseline TVaT and 37% difference in VaT 10–90 . Conclusion Changes in the configuration of an LV quadripolar lead significantly affected ventricular activation timings in both ischaemic and non-ischaemic subjects. This suggests that programming of the optimal pacing vector may need to be individually tailored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=19). Optimal quadripolar lead pacing vector vs. Baseline was evaluated on Total ventricular activation time (TVaT) (MD -16 ms). Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered via an optimal quadripolar lead vector significantly reduced total ventricular activation time by a mean of 16 ms compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: