Key result
99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake underestimated flow disparity during adenosine stress more than 201Tl in dogs with critical and mild coronary stenosis.
Why the study?
Does 99mTc-tetrofosmin compared with 201Tl better resolve relative underperfusion during adenosine stress in a canine model of coronary stenosis?
Does 99mTc-tetrofosmin compared with 201Tl better resolve relative underperfusion during adenosine stress in a canine model of coronary stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a canine model, 201Tl better resolves relative underperfusion during adenosine stress than 99mTc-tetrofosmin, likely due to the lower first-pass extraction fraction of 99mTc-tetrofosmin.
BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have shown a comparable coronary stenosis detection rate between 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 201Tl but with smaller defect magnitudes for 99mTc-tetrofosmin. The goals of this study were to measure the first-pass extraction fraction (EF) of 99mTc-tetrofosmin in canine myocardium and to compare 99mTc-tetrofosmin with 201Tl uptake during adenosine-induced vasodilatation in dogs with various degrees of coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: EF was calculated in 4 anesthetized, open-chest dogs after intracoronary administration of 125I-labeled albumin and 99mTc-tetrofosmin. In another 16 dogs with either critical (n=6) or mild (n= 10) left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenoses, 201Tl and 99mTc-tetrofosmin were administered during adenosine infusion (250 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Dogs were killed 5 minutes later, and tracer activities were determined by ex vivo imaging of heart slices and by well counting. Mean 99mTc-tetrofosmin EF was 54.0+/-3.7%. In the 6 critical-stenosis dogs, the LAD-to-left circumflex artery (LCx) microsphere flow ratio was 0.22+/-0.02 with adenosine. The LAD-to-LCx activity ratios were 0.37+/-0.04 for 201Tl and 0.67+/-0.05 for 99mTc-tetrofosmin (P<.01). For the 10 mild-stenosis dogs, the LAD-to-LCx flow ratio was 0.44+/-0.05. The 201Tl activity ratio was 0.58+/-0.04, compared with 0.81+/-0.04 for 99mTc-tetrofosmin (P<.01). Thus, in both groups, 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake underestimated the flow disparity more than 201Tl. Similarly, magnitudes of ex vivo image defects were significantly greater for 201Tl than for 99mTc-tetrofosmin in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this canine model, relative underperfusion with adenosine stress is better resolved with 201Tl than with 99mTc-tetrofosmin and may be explained by the lower EF for 99mTc tetrofosmin. With clinical imaging, greater 201Tl attenuation and redistribution may lessen this advantage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glover et al. (1997) studied Coronary stenosis (n=20). 99mTc-tetrofosmin vs. 201Tl was evaluated on LAD-to-LCx activity ratio in critical stenosis (p=<.01). 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake underestimated flow disparity during adenosine stress more than 201Tl in dogs with critical and mild coronary stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: