Key result
The developed pretreatment-based concentration method significantly improved the detection rate of African swine fever virus in pig oral fluids to 33.8% compared to 13.2% with the reference method.
Why the study?
Pooled oral fluids testing is practical for monitoring African swine fever virus, but lower virus concentrations compared to blood increase false negatives.
Does a pretreatment-based concentration protocol improve the detection of African swine fever virus in pig oral fluids compared to a reference method?
Observational (n=68)
Yes
Does a pretreatment-based concentration protocol improve the detection of African swine fever virus in pig oral fluids compared to a reference method?
Absolute Event Rate: 33.8% vs 13.2%
p-value: p=0.000512
A novel pretreatment-based concentration protocol significantly improves the sensitivity of ASFV detection in pig oral fluids, facilitating earlier diagnosis and outbreak control.
Early detection and early slaughter through quarantine are essential to prevent the spread of the African swine fever virus (ASFV). Pooled oral fluids testing is a practical approach for pathogen monitoring, but compared to blood, the virus concentration is lower, increasing false negatives. We developed a highly sensitive method for ASFV detection in pig oral fluids using a pretreatment-based concentration protocol. We collected oral fluids from sub-clinical raised pigs in northern Vietnam and conducted a field evaluation using the developed method. A spike test showed up to 100-fold greater sensitivity than a reference method. For performance evaluation, 68 pooled oral fluid samples were collected, of which 63 originated from raised pigs in northern Vietnam and 5 were obtained from healthy pigs in Japan as negative controls. Using real-time PCR, 9/68 (13.2%) were positive by the reference method, while 23/68 (33.8%) were positive by the developed method. Real-time LAMP detected 1/68 (1.5%) and 6/68 (8.8%) respectively. The developed method therefore improved the diagnostic performance and enabled early diagnosis prior to disease onset. These results suggest enhanced sensitivity and feasibility for early ASF diagnosis, potentially contributing to more effective outbreak control. The developed method offers a simple and sensitive tool for rapid ASFV screening in both affected and at-risk farms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2025) conducted an observational in African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection (n=68). Pretreatment-based viral concentration method vs. Reference DNA extraction method was evaluated on Detection rate of ASFV by real-time PCR (p=0.000512). The developed pretreatment-based concentration method significantly improved the detection rate of African swine fever virus in pig oral fluids to 33.8% compared to 13.2% with the reference method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: