Key result
Periodic resistance training with short-term cessation and resumption attenuated increases in arterial stiffness compared to continuous training (P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does periodic resistance training with short-term cessation attenuate increases in arterial stiffness compared to continuous resistance training in young healthy subjects?
RCT (n=18)
Randomly assigned
Does periodic resistance training with short-term cessation attenuate increases in arterial stiffness compared to continuous resistance training in young healthy subjects?
p-value: p=<0.05
Periodic resistance training with short detraining intervals attenuates the increase in arterial stiffness seen with continuous training, without compromising gains in muscle mass and strength.
Supports short cessation periods in resistance training to curb arterial stiffness without strength loss; extends optimization evidence beyond continuous protocols in young adults.
Although high-intensity resistance training (RT) increases arterial stiffness, removing weightlifting stimuli returns arterial stiffness to baseline levels within relatively short periods during 4-8 weeks. This study investigates the effects of repeated RT cessation and resumption on arterial stiffness. Eighteen young healthy subjects were randomly assigned to a group that performed continuous RT (CRT, n=9) and a group that performed periodic RT (PRT, n=9). Both groups performed RT at 75% of one repetition maximum for 3 days per week. The CRT group continuously trained for 16 weeks, whereas the PRT group performed 3 cycles of 4 weeks training, with 2 weeks detraining intervals between cycles. The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in the CRT group significantly increased (P<0.05) at 4, 6, 10, 12, 16 and 20 weeks from baseline, whereas in the PRT group it significantly increased (P<0.05) after 4, 10 and 16 weeks from baseline, and was significantly lower (P<0.05) than that of the CRT group after 6, 10, 12, 16 and 20 weeks. Muscle mass and strength in the both groups significantly increased after 16 weeks from baseline and persisted for 20 weeks (P<0.05). These results suggest that PRT, including short-term repeated cessation and resumption, attenuates increases in arterial stiffness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okamoto et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=18). Periodic resistance training (PRT) vs. Continuous resistance training (CRT) was evaluated on Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (arterial stiffness) (p=<0.05). Periodic resistance training with short-term cessation and resumption attenuated increases in arterial stiffness compared to continuous training (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: