Key result
LU 135.252 inhibits ET-1-induced arrhythmias and MAPD prolongation in dogs but not ischemic changes.
Why the study?
Does the endothelin-A-receptor antagonist LU 135.252 prevent ventricular arrhythmias caused by intrapericardial endothelin-1 infusion in open-chest dogs?
Population
12 open-chest mongrel dogs
Comparison
Intravenous bolus of endothelin-A-receptor… vs Intrapericardial infusion of endothelin-1 for 30…
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
30 minutes
Authors
Loading...
Supports ET-A blockade in ET-1 arrhythmia models; leaves open translation to human ischemic arrhythmias.
Does the endothelin-A-receptor antagonist LU 135.252 prevent ventricular arrhythmias caused by intrapericardial endothelin-1 infusion in open-chest dogs?
The endothelin-A-receptor antagonist LU 135.252 inhibits the arrhythmogenic and electrophysiological effects of pericardial endothelin-1 infusion in a canine model, although it does not prevent ischemic changes.
Kiss et al. (2000) studied ET-1-induced ventricular arrhythmias (n=12). LU 135.252 vs. ET-1 infusion without LU treatment was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmias and MAPD prolongation. LU 135.252 inhibited the arrhythmogenic action, MAPD prolongation, and early after depolarization formation caused by pericardial ET-1 infusion in dogs, but did not prevent ischemic changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: