Key result
Chronic ethanol exposure followed by binge administration in rats decreased LDL-receptor mRNA and increased angiotensinogen mRNA expression.
AIM: To investigated the status of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor and angiotensionogen gene expression in rats treated chronically with ethanol followed by binge administration, a model that mimics the human scenario. METHODS: Rats were chronically treated with ethanol in liquid diet for 4 wk followed by a single binge mode of ethanol administration (5 mg/kg body weight). Samples were processed 4 h after binge ethanol administration (chronic ethanol binge). Control rats were fed isocaloric diet. In the control for binge, ethanol was replaced by water. Expression of mRNA for angiotensinogen, c-fos and LDL-receptor, and nuclear accumulation of phospho-extracellular regulated kinases (ERK)1/2 and ERK1/2 protein were examined. RESULTS: Binge ethanol administration in chronically treated rats caused increase in steatosis and necrosis. Chronic ethanol alone had negligible effect on mRNA levels of LDL-receptor, or on the levels of nuclear ERK1/2 and phospho-ERK1/2. But, chronic ethanol followed by binge caused a decrease in LDL-receptor mRNA, and also decreased the levels of ERK1/2 and phospho-ERK1/2 in the nuclear compartment. On the other hand, chronic ethanol-binge increased mRNA expression of angiotensinogen and c-fos. CONCLUSION: Binge ethanol after chronic exposure, causes transcriptional dysregulation of LDL-receptor and angiotensinogen genes, both cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annayya R. Aroor (2011) studied Ethanol exposure. Chronic ethanol followed by binge administration vs. Isocaloric diet and water binge was evaluated on Expression of mRNA for angiotensinogen, c-fos and LDL-receptor, and nuclear accumulation of phospho-ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 protein. Chronic ethanol exposure followed by binge administration in rats decreased LDL-receptor mRNA and increased angiotensinogen mRNA expression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: