Key result
Aortic valve-sparing matches Bentall survival but is linked to more recurrent advanced aortic regurgitation.
Why the study?
Does the aortic valve-sparing procedure improve overall survival and reduce valve-related complications compared to the Bentall operation in patients with aortic root dilatation and advanced aortic regurgitation?
Population
120 patients with aortic root dilatation and moderate to severe aortic regurgitation
Comparison
Aortic valve-sparing procedure vs Bentall operation
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 4.9±3.1 years
Authors
Loading...
Valve-sparing may increase recurrent AR risk without survival benefit; leaves open optimal choice pending randomized trials.
Cohort (n=120)
Does the aortic valve-sparing procedure improve overall survival and reduce valve-related complications compared to the Bentall operation in patients with aortic root dilatation and advanced aortic regurgitation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.61
p-value: p=0.45
While valve-sparing procedures and the Bentall operation offer comparable long-term survival for aortic root dilatation with advanced AR, valve-sparing is associated with a higher risk of recurrent advanced aortic regurgitation.
Lim et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in aortic root dilatation with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (n=120). Aortic valve-sparing procedure vs. Bentall operation was evaluated on death (HR 0.61, p=0.45). The aortic valve-sparing procedure had similar risks of death (HR 0.61; p=0.45) compared to the Bentall operation, but was associated with more frequent recurrent advanced aortic regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: