Key result
Peri-device leaks after LAAO pose unclear ischemic stroke risk due to variable definitions and confounding.
Why the study?
The clinical significance of peri-device leak after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion remains unclear, driven by variable definitions, detection modalities, and confounding post-detection anticoagulation.
What is the clinical significance and association with ischemic stroke of peri-device leaks after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
What is the clinical significance and association with ischemic stroke of peri-device leaks after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
The clinical significance of peri-device leaks after LAAO remains unclear, highlighting an unmet need for standardized definitions and improved diagnostic assessment.
Should not yet alter LAAO decisions or stroke risk counseling; leaves open standardized assessment of peri-device leak impact.
Oral anticoagulation reduces the ischemic stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) but inherently increases the bleeding risk. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) offers an alternative to long-term anticoagulation in patients at risk for cardioembolic events due to underlying atrial fibrillation. Although long-term clinical data remain limited, percutaneous LAAO appears to be a safe and effective means of reducing hemorrhagic stroke and non-procedural-related bleeding events compared to warfarin. Incomplete closure of the LAA resulting in a peri-device leak (PDL) is common after interventions targeting the LAA and has been variably associated with an increased risk of embolic stroke in patients following LAAO. However, the clinical significance of PDL remains unclear, in part, due to variability in the definitions used for PDL, modalities used for the detection of PDL, and the confounding impact of continuing therapeutic anticoagulation in patients found to have PDL on surveillance imaging. In the current review, we examine the association of PDL with ischemic stroke and systemic embolization and explore mechanistic considerations in the development of PDL as they pertain to the unmet need for improving the diagnostic assessment of PDL from an anatomic and physiologic perspective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albaghdadi et al. (2020) conducted a review in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Peri-device leak (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) was evaluated on Ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. Peri-device leaks after left atrial appendage occlusion have an unclear clinical significance regarding ischemic stroke risk due to variable definitions, detection modalities, and confounding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: