Key result
Peri-device leaks <5 mm after left atrial appendage closure were not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism.
Why the study?
There is controversy regarding the clinical significance of residual leaks after LAA closure, particularly their association with thromboembolic events, and the management of severe leaks remains challenging.
Does peri-device leak after left atrial appendage closure increase the risk of thromboembolism in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
Does peri-device leak after left atrial appendage closure increase the risk of thromboembolism in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation?
While small peri-device leaks (<5 mm) after LAA closure do not appear to increase thromboembolic risk, severe leaks and those following epicardial closure remain a clinical challenge requiring further long-term study.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Device shape and catheter orientation may limit complete LAA closure; leaves open need for redesigned devices in AF.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has recently been approved as an alternative management for stroke prevention in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation who have difficulties with long-term oral anticoagulation. The various shapes and sizes of LAA and orientation of the atrial ostium may contribute to the incomplete LAA closure from circular design devices and orientation of the non-steerable delivery catheter. Incomplete closure of LAA leads to a high-velocity blood flow through the peri-device gap, resulting in peri-device leak (PDL). Residual leaks are frequently diagnosed after LAA closure procedures, regardless of closure methods. There is a controversy in the clinical significance of the leaks, particularly about its association with thromboembolic events. PDL <5 mm was not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism. Current literatures with small study population have not been sufficient to clarify the role of the leaks after LAA closure. Nevertheless, management of severe leaks has been a challenging concern for cardiologists. Leaks after epicardial LAA closures are at the neck of the incompletely closed LAA and have shown to increase the risk of thromboembolism. Percutaneous closure of the leaks after LAA closure has been attempted with good safety and success, but long-term safety and efficacy remains unclear. Further large long-term studies which aim to assess the role of leaks or PDLs in predicting thromboembolic events and management strategies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jang et al. (2021) conducted a review in chronic atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage closure was evaluated. Peri-device leaks <5 mm after left atrial appendage closure were not associated with any increase of risk for thromboembolism.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: