Key result
Concomitant ACS in acute heart failure is linked to ~61% higher hospital mortality.
Why the study?
Does concomitant acute coronary syndrome worsen mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=2,609)
Yes
Does concomitant acute coronary syndrome worsen mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, concomitant acute coronary syndrome is associated with higher in-hospital mortality but similar long-term survival compared to those without ACS.
BACKGROUND: Little is know about the outcomes of acute heart failure (AHF) with acute coronary syndrome (ACS-AHF), compared to those without ACS (NACS-AHF). METHODS: We conducted a prospective registry of AHF patients involving 18 hospitals in Saudi Arabia between October 2009 and December 2010. In this sub-study, we compared the clinical correlates, management and hospital course, as well as short, and long-term outcomes between AHF patients with and without ACS. RESULTS: Of the 2609 AHF patients enrolled, 27.8 % presented with ACS. Compared to NACS-AHF patients, ACS-AHF patients were more likely to be old males (Mean age = 62.7 vs. 60.8 years, p = 0.003, and 73.8 % vs. 62.7 %, p < 0.001, respectively), and to present with De-novo heart failure (56.6 % vs. 28.1 %, p < 0.001). Additionally they were more likely to have history of ischemic heart disease, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and less likely to have chronic kidney disease (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The prevalence of severe LV systolic dysfunction (EF < 30 %) was higher in ACS-AHF patients. During hospital stay, ACS-AHF patients were more likely to develop shock (p < 0.001), recurrent heart failure (p = 0.02) and needed more mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001). β blockers and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors were used more often in ACS-AHF patients (p = 0.001 and, p = 0.004 respectively). ACS- AHF patients underwent more coronary angiography and had higher prevalence of multi-vessel coronary artery disease (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The unadjusted hospital and one-month mortality were higher in ACS-AHF patients (OR = 1.6 (1.2-2.2), p = 0.003 and 1.4 (1.0-1.9), p = 0.026 respectively). A significant interaction existed between the level of left ventricular ejection fraction and ACS-AHF status. After adjustment, ACS-AHF status was only significantly associated with hospital mortality (OR = 1.6 (1.1-2.4), p = 0.019). The three-years survival following hospital discharge was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: AHF patients presenting with ACS had worse hospital prognosis, and an equivalent long-term survival compared to AHF patients without ACS. These findings underscore the importance of timely recognition and management of AHF patients with concomitant ACS given their distinct presentation and underlying pathophysiology compared to other AHF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AlFaleh et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=2,609). Concomitant acute coronary syndrome (ACS-AHF) vs. Acute heart failure without acute coronary syndrome (NACS-AHF) was evaluated on Hospital mortality (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.4, p=0.019). Acute heart failure patients presenting with concomitant acute coronary syndrome had a higher risk of hospital mortality compared to those without acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: