Emergency surgery for left main disease: with and without cardioplegic arrest

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the on-pump beating-heart technique of coronary artery bypass in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left main disease, and to retrospectively compare the early postoperative results with those of conventional on-pump arrested-heart coronary surgery. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with acute myocardial infarction caused by left main disease, who underwent emergency surgery between January 1998 and April 2017 at Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 56 were evaluated using propensity-matched analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure: group A ( n = 28) had on-pump surgery on the arrested heart, and group B ( n = 28) had on-pump surgery on the beating heart. Early postoperative results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: , p = 0.01). The early mortality rate was higher in group A than group B, but the difference was not significant (group A 28.6% vs. group B 17.9%, p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant advantage based on surgical procedure between on-pump beating-heart surgery and on-pump surgery on the arrested heart. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting significantly reduced the peak creatine kinase myocardial band level, but there were no significant differences in the early postoperative data, including the mortality rate and left ventricular function.