Key result
Hypercontractile and hypocontractile HFpEF phenotypes are linked to ~56% higher MACE risk than intermediate LV elastance.
Why the study?
HFpEF is a heterogeneous entity including different LV function phenotypes, and the value of resting LV elastance (force) using transthoracic echocardiography to identify these phenotypes was unknown.
Does resting left ventricular elastance measured by transthoracic echocardiography identify distinct phenotypes and prognostic risks in patients with HFpEF?
Population
2,380 patients with HFpEF
Comparison
Low force vs intermediate force vs high force groups
Design
Retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study
Follow-up
Median 16 months
Authors
Loading...
May stratify HFpEF prognosis via resting LV elastance; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Observational (n=2,380)
Yes
Does resting left ventricular elastance measured by transthoracic echocardiography identify distinct phenotypes and prognostic risks in patients with HFpEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 22.9% vs 14.7%
p-value: p=0.036
Resting left ventricular elastance measured by volumetric transthoracic echocardiography can identify distinct HFpEF phenotypes, with hypercontractile and hypocontractile states associated with a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=2,380). Resting left ventricular elastance (force) phenotypes vs. Intermediate force (3.24-5.48 mm Hg/mL) was evaluated on Composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (p=0.036). Resting LV elastance identified hypercontractile and hypocontractile HFpEF phenotypes, which had higher MACE rates (22.9% and 16.1% person-years) than the intermediate phenotype (14.7%; P=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: