Key result
Top quartiles of ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP predict ~112% higher 1-year death or transplant risk in HF.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the additional determination of ceruloplasmin levels could improve the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in heart failure patients over a 1-year follow-up.
Does the combined evaluation of ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP improve risk stratification for death or heart transplantation in heart failure patients?
Cohort (n=741)
Does the combined evaluation of ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP improve risk stratification for death or heart transplantation in heart failure patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The combined assessment of ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP improves 1-year risk stratification for death or heart transplantation in advanced heart failure patients compared to either biomarker alone.
We investigated whether the additional determination of ceruloplasmin (Cp) levels could improve the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in heart failure (HF) patients in a 1-year follow-up. Cp and NT-proBNP levels and clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed simultaneously at baseline in 741 HF patients considered as possible heart transplant recipients. The primary endpoint (EP) was a composite of all-cause death (non-transplant patients) or heart transplantation during one year of follow-up. Using a cut-off value of 35.9 mg/dL for Cp and 3155 pg/mL for NT-proBNP (top interquartile range), a univariate Cox regression analysis showed that Cp (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.086; 95% confidence interval (95% CI, 1.462–2.975)), NT-proBNP (HR = 3.221; 95% CI (2.277–4.556)), and the top quartile of both Cp and NT-proBNP (HR = 4.253; 95% CI (2.795–6.471)) were all risk factors of the primary EP. The prognostic value of these biomarkers was demonstrated in a multivariate Cox regression model using the top Cp and NT-proBNP concentration quartiles combined (HR = 2.120; 95% CI (1.233–3.646)). Lower left ventricular ejection fraction, VO2max, lack of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, and nonimplantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator were also independent risk factors of a poor outcome. The combined evaluation of Cp and NT-proBNP had advantages over separate NT-proBNP and Cp assessment in selecting a group with a high 1-year risk. Thus multi-biomarker assessment can improve risk stratification in HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romuk et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=741). Top quartile of both ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP vs. Lower quartiles was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death (non-transplant patients) or heart transplantation (HR 2.120, 95% CI 1.233-3.646). The combined top quartiles of ceruloplasmin and NT-proBNP independently predicted a higher 1-year risk of death or heart transplantation in heart failure patients (HR 2.120; 95% CI 1.233-3.646).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: