Key result
TAVR shows no difference versus SAVR in 12-month quality of life improvements.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to prospectively evaluate depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing SAVR or TAVR.
Do TAVR and SAVR improve depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in patients with aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=300)
No
Do TAVR and SAVR improve depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in patients with aortic stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement lead to significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and frailty by 3 to 12 months postoperatively.
Background Our objective was to report on the prospective outcomes in the areas of depression, quality of life, angina, and frailty in SAVR and TAVR patients with aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve intervention. Methods We recruited 300 patients across 3 groups (TAVR, SAVR, and CABG) over 12 months. Depression, quality of life, frailty, and angina were assessed followed by propensity score matching. ResultsUsing logistical regression when all patient factors considered for all patients who had SAVR and TAVR, the only preoperative factors that impacted on 1-year mortality was hypertension and STS score. Quality of life improvements within each group over 12 months was significant (p-value =0.0001). Depression at 12 months between groups (p-value =0.0395) and within each group was significant (p-value = 0.0073 for SAVR and 0.0001 for TAVR). Angina was most frequent in TAVR at 12 months in the QL (p=0.0001), PL (p=0.0007), and improvement was significant in the QL (SAVR p=0.0010, TAVR p= 0.0001) and PL (SAVR p=0.0002), TAVR p=0.0007) domains in both groups. Frailty at 12 months improved in both groups, but was greatest in TAVR (p-value = 0.00126). Conclusions This 12-month follow up of cardiac surgical patients has revealed significant improvement in PROMs and frailty in all groups by 3-months postoperative regardless of surgical or transcatheter approach. Outcome measures of quality of life and frailty should be utilized as a measure of outcome more regularly in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery regardless of approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Surman et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (n=300). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Quality of life (EQ-5D health state VAS score) at 12 months (p=0.80). Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement both improved quality of life over 12 months, with no significant difference in 12-month health state between the two approaches.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: