The authors describe a detailed comparison of a 850 degrees C wet oxide and a 900 degrees C dry oxide as the MOS gate dielectric in a 0.8- mu m CMOS process. The device fabrication involves a GE 0.8- mu m CMOS process. Emphasis is given to poly-Si gate linewidth measurements which are crucial to the interpretation of the results. The comparison of thin oxide integrity, device characteristics, hot-electron reliability, and total-dose radiation hardness between the two oxides is discussed. Specifically, it is pointed out why the PMOS punchthrough voltage requirements mandate the use of a 850 degrees C wet oxide for the gate dielectric.>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: